- Civil judge senior division fast track court verdict
- Said, a team of 5 people of the Archaeological Department of the Center should be formed
- Archaeological survey of the campus should be conducted
Of Varanasi In the case of Vishwanath Temple and Gyanvapi Mosque The decision of the district court has arrived. The Civil Judge Senior Division Fast Track Court has given a decision in favor of conducting the archaeological survey in the Kashi Vishwanath Temple and the Gyanvapi Mosque case located in the same enclave. The court has said that a team of 5 people from the Archaeological Department of the center should be studied and the entire campus. It is worth mentioning that on April 2, the Civil Judge Senior Division Fast Track Court reserved the verdict on the application of the plaintiff temple side on the Archaeological Survey case.
Significantly, in a lawsuit filed by the Kashi Vishwanath Temple side since 1991, it was demanded that the mosque is a part of the Jyotirlinga Vishveshwara temple where Hindu believers have the right to worship, worship and worship. This case from the court was filed by the ancient idol Swayambhu Jyotirlinga Lord Vishweshwar’s party Pandit Somnath Vyas and others. Anjuman Intezamia Masjid and other opposition are in the case. Two litigants, Dr Ramrang Sharma and Pandit Somnath Vyas, who filed the case, have died, after which Vadamitra former District Government Advocate (Civil) Vijay Shankar Rastogi, who was representing the place of Pandit Somnath Vyas, said in the application that the alleged The Shivling of Swayambhu Visvesvarnath is still established in the disputed campus. It is one of the twelve Jyotirlingas in the country and Muslims have built a mosque by occupying the temple premises. The application said that on 15 August 1947, the nature of the disputed complex was of the temple itself.
The plaintiff had appealed to the court to ask for the report from the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) from the physical and archaeological point of view by surveying the radar technique and digging the premises. On this, the court also sought objection from the opposition.
The plaintiff Vijayashankar Rastogi states that the dispute was raised on behalf of the Muslim side that the religious position of the disputed site i.e. Gyanvapi Masjid was that of the mosque on 15 August 1947 and the ongoing case should be quashed on the same basis against which the Hindu side Keeping its side from the court, it was told that the Gyanvapi mosque of the entire Vishwanath temple complex is a disputed part and should be based on evidence to determine the religious status. Therefore, in 1998, the first Additional District Magistrate was ordered to take evidence of the entire Gyanvapi complex. The Muslim side went against him in a writ petition in the High Court. Due to this, its action was postponed. Now after the postponement order is over, the Archaeological Society of India, New Delhi and the Department of Archeology, UP government was issued a writ requesting the court to take the archaeological evidence of the entire intellectual complex through the court and excavation through the radar. After doing this, Swambhu sits under the dome space in the middle of the disputed site of the Visheshwar Jyotirlinga, get it reflected and take the evidence of the entire knowledge complex. The application for this was filed in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division- Fast Track Court).